Main Article Content

Abstract

This article aims to examine polygyny discourse from juridical, sociological and ontological aspects. Using the doctrinal writing method with a conceptual approach and statutory regulations, it was found that: Polygyny discourse from juridical, sociological and ontological aspects will face the legality of polygyny which is accommodated in statutory regulations even though with strict requirements and meets asociological spec where the practice of polygyny has not been fully accepted by society. Both those who want polygyny and those who reject polygyny. Because for those who want to be polygynous, the existing arrangements are considered very difficult and half-hearted because the conditions that must be met to be polygynous are very difficult to fulfill. So to carry out polygyny, sometimes they violate the law by marrying in a serial manner. But for those who reject polygyny, this arrangement is considered to legalize polygyny even though it is only through a legal loophole opened as a result of certain conditions. Then also face aontological spec that will bridge the juridical and sociological aspects. Ontological aspects related to asas marriage law that confirmsIn a marriage, a man can only have one wife. A woman can only have one husband, so polygyny is a special condition that is opened with certain considerations to achieve the goals of marriage. The ontological aspect is also related to justice which is difficult to realize in polygyny.

Keywords

Discourse Marriage Polygyny Sociology of Law

Article Details

Author Biographies

Ade Arif Firmansyah, Universitas Lampung

Faculty of Law

Malicia Evendia, Universitas Lampung

Faculty of Law

How to Cite
Firmansyah, A. A., & Evendia, M. . (2024). POLYGYNY DISCOURSE FROM JURIDICA, SOCIOLOGICAL AND ONTOLOGICAL ASPECT: DISKURSUS POLIGINI DARI ASPEK YURIDIS, SOSIOLOGIS DAN ONTOLOGIS. Constitutional Law Society, 3(1), 14–24. https://doi.org/10.36448/cls.v3i1.65

References

  1. Anonymous, 2009. Marriage and the Compilation of Islamic Law. Justisia Library. Yogyakarta.
  2. Bruggink, JJH 1996. Reflections on Law. PT Citra Aditya Bakti. Bandung.
  3. Fanani, Ahmad Zaenal. Paper. Theory of Justice in the Perspective of Legal and Islamic Philosophy.
  4. Friedrich, Carl Joachim. 2004. Historical Perspective Legal Philosophy. Nuansa and Nusamedia. Bandung.
  5. Hadjon, PM et all, 1993. Introduction to Indonesian Administrative Law. UGM Press. Yogyakarta.
  6. Hart, HLA 2009. The Concept of Law. Nusamedia. Bandung.
  7. Hart, Michael H. 1982. One Hundred of the Most Influential Figures in History. Mahbub Junaidi translation, Dunia Pustaka Jaya. Jakarta.
  8. Johnson, Alvis S. 1994. Sociology of Law. Rineka Cipta Publishers. Jakarta.
  9. Rahardjo, Satjipto. 1986. Legal Science. Alumni. Bandung.
  10. Rawls, John. 1973. A Theory of Justice. Oxford University press. London, which has been translated into Indonesian by Uzair Fauzan and Heru Prasetyo. 2006. Theory of Justice. Student Library. Yogyakarta.
  11. Shihab, M Quraish. 2008. M. Quraish Shihab Answers-1001 Islamic questions that you should know. Heart Lantern. Jakarta.
  12. Soekanto, Soerjono. 1988. Basics of Sociology of Law. PT Raja Grafindo Persada. Jakarta.
  13. Soekanto, Soerjono. 1997. Introduction to the Sociology of Law. Bharata Publishers. Jakarta.
  14. Tisnanta, HS et al. 1999. Philosophy of Law. Unila press. Bandar Lampung.
  15. Yuswanto. 2010. Lecture materials on legal theory 1. Master of Law Study Program, University of Lampung.