Main Article Content

Abstract

Discourse of reviving the direction of the country is still ongoing as an effort to correct the national development planning system that is currently used. The pros and cons of coloring efforts to revive the direction of the country. The revival of the direction of the state is considered a manifestation of the return of the authoritarian system of authoritarianism in the new order era. On the contrary, the positive response to reviving PPHN is able to ensure that national development is more thorough, directed, integrated, sustainable and accountable. The problem is how the urgency of forming PPHN as a guideline for the direction of national development in the future? This research is normative juridical research using a statutory approach (statute approach) and a conceptual approach (conceptual approach). The national development system based on the SPPN Law has various weaknesses. this system is still executive heavy and vulnerable to abuser practices has various weaknesses. this system is still executive heavy and vulnerable to abuse of power. In addition, the current national development system provides a gap between the pattern of government development at the central, provincial, district/city levels plus between the leadership before and after it so as to create development that is directed, sustainable and more accountable. It is necessary to reformulate the PPHN which is regulated in the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia and subsequently implemented in the system of administering state government power in Indonesia. The granting of constitutional authority to the MPR in the formation and determination of the PPHN will provide a unified perception considering that all colors of political parties take a common consensus for the interests of the nation and state. The implementation of development will be accountable to the MPR in the form of a performance report, even though the president is no longer the mandate of the MPR. This accountability is an effort to revive the principle of checks and balances on the implementation of national development.

Keywords

Reformulation PPHN National Development

Article Details

How to Cite
Anggoro, F. N. . (2023). REFORMULATION OF STATE PROPERTIES AS A GUIDELINE FOR THE DIRECTION OF INDONESIA’S NATIONAL DEVELOPMENT: REFORMULASI HALUAN NEGARA SEBAGAI PEDOMAN ARAH PEMBANGUNAN NASIONAL INDONESIA. Constitutional Law Society, 2(1), 31–41. https://doi.org/10.36448/cls.v2i2.48

References

  1. Arliman S, Laurensius. “Wacana Program Pembangunan Nasional Semesta Berencana Atau GBHN sebagai Landasan Pembangunan Negara Berkelanjutan”, Jurnal Manajemen Pembangunan 3, no. 1, (2016), h. 1- 31, https://osf.io/3kfhu/
  2. Asshiddiqie, Jimly. Konstitusi Ekonomi. Jakarta: Kompas, 2010.
  3. Badan Pengkajian MPR RI. Kajian Akademik: Konstitusionalisasi Haluan Negara Pada UUD NRI Tahun 1945 Pasca Amandemen. Jakarta: Badan Pengkajian MPR RI, 2020.
  4. Badan Pengkajian MPR RI. Urgensi GBHN Dalam Penyelenggaraan Pembangunan Nasional. Jakarta: Badan Pengkajian MPR RI, 2017.
  5. Cahyono, Ma’ruf. Restorasi Haluan Negara Indonesia. Jakarta: Kencana, 2019.
  6. Fitri, Rizki Rahayu, dan Eka N.A.M. Sihombing. “Kajian Yuridis Kewenangan Majelis Permusyawaratan Rakyat Dalam Penetapan Kebijakan Rencana Pembangunan Nasional”, Jurnal Restitusi 1 no. 1, (Januari-Juni 2019): h. 41-62.
  7. Fitriani, dkk. (ed.). Reformulasi Kebijakan Haluan Negara, Antara Realita dan Cita-Cita. Medan: Enam Media. 2019.
  8. Mudiyati Rahmatunnisa, Sistem Perencanaan Pembangunan Nasional (SPPN), Garis-Garis Besar Haluan Negara (GBHN) dan Peran Majelis Permusyawaratan Rakyat (MPR), Disampaikan pada Seminar Nasional Sistem Ketatanegaraan Indonesia: Reformulasi Model GBHN: Tinjauan Terhadap Peran dan Fungsi MPR RI dalam Sistem Perencanaan Pembangunan Nasional, Kerjasama MPR dengan Universitas Padjadjaran, Kamis 25 April 2013, https://www.academia.edu/25213742/Sistem_Perencanaan_Pembangunan_Nasional_SPPN_Garis_Garis_Besar_Haluan_Negara_GBHN_dan_Peran_Majelis_Permusyawaratan_Rakyat_MPR_1
  9. Prijambodo, Bambang dan Prahesti Pandanwangi. “Politik Hukum Menghidupkan Kembali Haluan negara”, Jurnal Majelis 8, (Agustus 2018): h. 15-22.
  10. Rohi, Sofia L, “Implikasi Amandemen Undang-Undang Dasar 1945 Terhadap Sistem Perencanaan Pembangunan Nasional” Jurnal Politika 4, no. 1, (April 2013), hal. 82-92. https://doi.org/10.14710/politika.4.2.2013.82-92
  11. Sjafrizal. Perencanaan Pembangunan Daerah Dalam Era Otonomi. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers, 2014.
  12. Sorik, Sutan. “Reformulasi Arah Pembangunan Ideologi Politik Nasional Model Garis-Garis Besar Haluan Negara”, Jurnal Majelis 12, (Agustus 2018): h. 83-94.
  13. Susanto, Mei. “Wacana Menghidupkan Kembali GBHN Dalam Sistem Presidensil Indonesia”, Jurnal Penelitian Hukum DE JURE, 17, no. 3 (September 2017): 427 – 445.