Article Sidebar

Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 198 Download : 166

Main Article Content

Abstract

Until now, there is still no authority of the Constitutional Court to examine constitutional complaint cases, even though at least 30 (thirty) cases are declared unacceptable because the substance of the petition is constitutional complaint. In several countries, constitutional complaint has become one of the powers of the Constitutional Court as a legal remedy that citizens can take if there is a violation of their constitutional rights, such as in Germany and South Korea. Based on this background, the formulation of the problem in this is first, what is the urgency of adding constitutional complaint as the authority of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia? Second, how is the legal construction of the implementation of constitutional complaint in Indonesia? This research is legal research with a statutory, conceptual, and comparative approach. This research will describe first, the urgency of adding constitutional complaint as the authority of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia and second, the legal construction of the application of constitutional complaint in Indonesia by comparing the arrangement and implementation of constitutional complaint in other countries, namely Germany and South Korea.

Keywords

Comparative Approach Constitutional Complaint Constitutional Court

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Dewi, D. A. G. S. ., Nugraha, X., & Laurentius, M. E. . (2022). THE AUTHORITY OF THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURT IN HANDLING CONSTITUTIONAL COMPLAINTS: A COMPARATIVE STUDY WITH GERMANY AND SOUTH KOREA: KEWENANGAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI DALAM MENANGANI PENGADUAN KONSTITUSIONAL: STUDI KOMPARATIF DENGAN JERMAN DAN KOREA SELATAN. Constitutional Law Society, 1(2), 127–139. https://doi.org/10.36448/cls.v1i2.28
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Asmono, A. (2011). Gagasan Pengaduan Konstitusional Dan Penerapannya Dalam Sistem Ketatanegaraan Indonesia. Yuridika, 26(23). https://doi.org/10.20473/ydk.v26i3.273
  2. Asshiddiqie, J. (2010). Pengantar Ilmu Hukum Tata Negara. Rajawali Pres.
  3. Azis, A. (2018). Constitutional complaint & Constitutional Question Dalam Negara Hukum. Prenada Media.
  4. Duchacek, Ivo D. (1987). Constitution/Constitutionalism. Blackwell.
  5. Faiz, P.M. (2016). A Prospect and Challenges For Adopting Constitutional Complaint and Constitutional Question In The Indonesian Constitutional Court. Constitutional Review, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.31078/consrev215
  6. Harimurti, Y. W. (2019). Dasar Hukum Penataan Lembaga Negara Yang Tidak Diatur Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Pancasila dan Kewarganegaraan, 4(1). http://dx.doi.org/10.17977/um019v4i1p186-196
  7. I. P. Perangin-angin, R. Rahayu, and N. Dwiwarno. (2019). Kewajiban Dan Tanggungjawab Negara Memberikan Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Perempuan Korban Revenge Porn Di Indonesia. Diponegoro Law Journal, 8 (1).
  8. Laica Marzuki, H.M. (2004). Menjaga Denyut Konstitusi Refleksi Satu Tahun Mahkamah Konstitusi. Konstitusi Press.
  9. Lailam, T. (2021). Peran Mahkamah Konstitusi Federal Jerman Dalam Perlindungan Hak Fundamental Warga Negara Berdasarkan Kewenangan Pengaduan Konstitusional. Jurnal HAM, 13(1). http://dx.doi.org/10.30641/ham.2022.13.1
  10. Manan, B. (2017). Perbandingan Hukum Tata Negara Sebagai Obyek Penyelidikan Keilmuan Dan Pengajaran Pada Program Pendidikan Tinggi Hukum”. In Konferensi Nasional Asosiasi Dosen Pengajar Hukum Perbandingan Indonesia (ADPHI) “Perbandingan Hukum Dan Perkembangan Sistem Hukum: Konvergensi Atau Divergensi?. Fakultas Hukum Universitas Airlangga Surabaya.
  11. Mkri.id. (2022). Ketua MK: Constitutional Question Sebagai Perlindungan Konstitusional Warga Negara. Retrieved from https://www.mkri.id/index.php?page=web.Berita&id=15907
  12. Nugraha, X., Katherina, A.M.F., Ramadhanty, S.F., Tanbun, E.P. Constitutional Question: Alternatif Baru Pelindungan Hak Konstitusional Warga Negara Melalui Concrete Review di Indonesia. (2019). Negara Hukum: Membangun Hukum untuk Keadilan dan Kesejahteraan, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.22212/jnh.v10i1.1209
  13. Palguna, I Dewa Gede. (2013). Pengaduan Konstitusional (Constitutional Complaint): Upaya Hukum Terhadap Pelanggaran Hak-Hak Konstitusional Warga Negara. Sinar Grafika.
  14. Purnamasari, G. C. (2013). Pengaduan Konstitusional (Constitutional Complaint): Upaya Hukum Terhadap Pelanggaran Hak-Hak Konstitusional Warga Negara. Sinar Grafika.
  15. Purnamasari, G. C. (2017). Upaya Hukum Terhadap Pelanggaran Hak-Hak Konstitusional Warga Negara Melalui Pengaduan Konstitusional (Constitutional Complaint). Vej, 3(2). https://doi.org/10.25123/vej.2668
  16. Ramadhan, F., Nugraha, X., Felany, P. I. (2020). Penataan Ulang Kewenangan Penyidikan Dan Penuntutan Dalam Penegakan Hukum Pelanggaran HAM Berat. Veritas et Justitia, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.25123/vej.v6i1.3514
  17. Sanusi, H.M. A. (2011). Tebaran Pemikiran Hukum Dan Konstitusi. Milestone.
  18. Siagian, A. H. (2020). Constitutional Complaint as Strengthening Constitualism in Indonesia. Rand Inter Social Sci, 1(3). https://doi.org/10.47175/v1i3.102
  19. Siahaan, M. (2010). Hukum Acara Mahkamah Konstitusi. Konstitusi Press.
  20. Thompson, B. (1997). Textbook of Constitutional and Administrative Law. Balestone Press London.
  21. Yulida, D., Utama, K.W., Nugraha, X. (2022). Verifikasi Manual Manifestasi Asas Kecermatan Sebagai Batu Uji Terhadap Keputuan Tata Usaha Negara. Usm Law Review, 5(1). http://dx.doi.org/10.26623/julr.v5i1.4600
  22. Zoelva, H. (2010). Penerapan Pengaduan Konstitusional (Constitutional Complaint) Di Berbagai Negara. Makalah Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia.
  23. Zoelva, H. (2012). Constitutional Complaint Dan Constitutional Question Dan Perlindungan Hak-Hak Konstitusional Warga Negara. Media Hukum, 19(1). https://doi.org/10.18196/jmh.v19i1.1984