Article Sidebar

Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 270 Download : 148

Main Article Content

Abstract

The Health Social Security Administering Body is a public legal entity whose main task is to provide improved health services to the entire community. With the existence of health insurance products, it is hoped that all Indonesian people can experience health services equally to all levels of society. Doctors are one of the leading professions in the health sector. The main task of a doctor is to provide optimal service to everyone who has problems with their health interests in accordance with and carried out in accordance with the doctor’s professional code of ethics. This research is juridical normative, which is a form of research that will analyze a problem and solve it using legal materials obtained based on facts, literature, and expert arguments and analyze article by article in the legislation so that the results of this study will provide a explanation of existing legal issues to be used as guidelines in improving medical service standards by the government. There are quite a lot of participants in the Health Social Security Organizing Agency in Indonesia. This shows that more and more people need easy access to health services. This must be supported by human resources (doctors, nurses, and related parties) and agencies such as hospitals or health centers in improving the quality of health services. A doctor has a professional code of ethics in carrying out his duties, namely he must carry out health services seriously in accordance with his competence to be able to provide optimal service to patients while respecting human dignity.

Keywords

Doctor’s Profession Code of Ethics Health Social Security Administering Body

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Author Biographies

Nabbilah Amir, Universitas Surabaya

Fakultas Hukum

Anissa Rachma Damayanti, Universitas Surabaya

Fakultas Hukum

How to Cite
Amir, N. ., & Damayanti, A. R. (2022). LEGAL ASPECTS OF MEDICAL PRACTICE IMPLEMENTATION: DISPUTES OF CODE OF ETHICS IN HANDLING PATIENTS HEALTH SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTERING AGENCY . Constitutional Law Society, 1(1), 62–77. https://doi.org/10.36448/cls.v1i1.23
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Aspinall, E. (2014). Health care and democratization in Indonesia. Democratization, 21(5), 803–823. https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2013.873791
  2. Amin, M. E., Hafidah, N., Gozali, D. S., Faisal, A., Tornado, A. S., Irawan, R., & Firdaus, A. (2020). Public understandings of healthcare services regulations. Systematic Reviews in Pharmacy, 11(3), 393–398. https://doi.org/10.5530/srp.2020.3.49
  3. Borysowski, J., Ehni, H. J., & Górski, A. (2021). Ethics codes and medical decision making. Patient Education and Counseling, 104(6), 1312–1316. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2020.10.034
  4. BPJS Ketenagakerjaan, Retrieved from https://www.bpjskesehatan.go.id/bpjs/post/read/2019/1019/Akreditasi Rumah-SakitJadi-Syarat-Wajib-Kerjasama-dengan-BPJS-Kesehatan
  5. Camelia, F. (2020). Analisis landasan ilmu pengetahuan dan teknologi. Susunan Artikel Pendidikan, 5(1), 57–65.
  6. Dody Firmanda, Disiplin Profesi Kedokteran, Retrieved from http://kki.go.id/assets/data/arsip/DFMateri_Workshop_JSLG_Disiplin_Profesi_Kedokteran.pdf
  7. Hendri Keremer, Retrieved from https://mediaindonesia.com/nusantara/123464/tolak-basien-bpjssatu-dokter-rsud-bintan-dinonaktifkan Indonesia. Peraturan Konsil Kedokteran Indonesia Tentang Disiplin professional Dokter dan Dokter Gigi. Perkonsil No.4 Tahun 2011, BN No. 304 Tahun 2012 Pasal 2
  8. Jost, T. S., Mulcahy, L., Strasser, S., & Sachs, L. A. (1993). Consumers, complaints, and professional discipline: a look at medical licensure boards. Health Matrix (Cleveland, Ohio : 1991), 3(2), 309–338.
  9. Kasuma, N., Bahar, A., & Tegnan, H. (2018). Law and medical disciplinary sanctions: Enhancing medical practice and health quality in Indonesia. Journal of Legal, Ethical and Regulatory Issues, 21(4).
  10. KEPMENKES. (2007). Standar Profesi Perekam Medis dan Informasi Kesehatan. Departemen Kesehatan Republik Indonesia Nomor.377/MENKES/SKIII?2007.
  11. Mia Citra D, Retrieved from https://lifestyle.bisnis.com/read/20200310/106/1211210/pesertabpjs-kesehatan-capai-223-juta-orang
  12. Mariyam, S. (2018). Sistem Jaminan Sosial Nasional Melalui Badan Penyelenggara Jaminan Sosial ( BPJS ) Kesehatan ( Perspektif Hukum Asuransi ). Jurnal Ilmiah UNTAG Semarang, 7(2), 36–42.
  13. Nasution, B. J. (2005). Hukum Kesehatan dan Pertanggungjawaban Dokter. Penerbit Rhenika Cipta: Jakarta.
  14. Majelis Kehormatan Etika Kedokteran (MKEK). (2012). Kode Etik Kedokteran Indonesia dan Pedoman Pelaksanaan Kode Etik Kedokteran Indonesia. Kode Etik Kedokteran (pp. 1–80). Retrieved from http://www.idai.or.id/professional-resources/ethic/kode-etikkedokteran-indonesia
  15. Miswardi, Nasfi, & Antoni. (2021). Etika, Moralitas dan Penegak Hukum. Menara Ilmu, 15(2), 150–162.
  16. Ni nyoman, A. R. P. (2020). Tanggung Jawab Hukum Dalam Penolakan Pasien Jaminan Kesehtan Nasional. 1–23.
  17. Nurdin, M. (2015). Prinsip Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Pasien Atas Korban Malpraktek Kedokteran, Publikasi: Samudera Keadilan. Vol 10 No. 1 Januari-Juni 2015. Retrieved from https://media.neliti.com/media/publications/240395-perlindunganhukum-terhadap-pasien-atas-97f6abae.pdf
  18. Pengurus Besar Ikatan Dokter Indonesia. (2012). Kode Etik Kedokteran Indonesia. Retrieved from http://www.idai.or.id/professionalresources/ethic/kode-etik-kedokteran-indonesia Paulia L.T, Retrieved from https://www.alomedika.com/kajian-etik-danmedikolegal-mengenai-menolak-pasien
  19. Rozaliyani, A., Meilia, P. D. I., & Libritany, N. (2018). Prinsip Penetapan Sanksi bagi Pelanggaran Etik Kedokteran. Jurnal Etika Kedokteran Indonesia, 2(1), 19. https://doi.org/10.26880/jeki.v2i1.11
  20. Rozaliyani, A, Meilia PDI, Liberty N. 2018. Prinsip Penetapan Sanksi Bagi Pelanggaran Etik Kedoketeran, Publikasi: JEKI/ilmiah.id. Vol 2 No. 1. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/323862277_Prinsip_Peneta pan_Sanksi_bagi_Pelanggaran_Etik_Kedokteran
  21. Rideng, I. W. (2013). Metode Penelitian Hukum Normatif. Kertha Widya, 1(1), 136–149.
  22. Rozaliyani, A., Meilia, P. D. I., & Libritany, N. (2018). Prinsip Penetapan Sanksi bagi Pelanggaran Etik Kedokteran. Jurnal Etika Kedokteran Indonesia, 2(1), 19. https://doi.org/10.26880/jeki.v2i1.11
  23. Solechan, S. (2019). Badan Penyelenggara Jaminan Sosial (BPJS) Kesehatan Sebagai Pelayanan Publik. Administrative Law and Governance Journal, 2(4), 686–696. https://doi.org/10.14710/alj.v2i4.686-696
  24. Salim, D. L. F. (2020). AKSESIBILITAS PEMBIAYAAN KESEHATAN DALAM PROGRAM JAMINAN KESEHATAN NASIONAL. LEX ET SOCIETATIS, 8(4). https://doi.org/10.35796/les.v8i4.30915
  25. Setiani, B. (2018). Pertanggungjawaban Hukum Perawat Dalam Hal Pemenuhan Kewajiban dan Kode Etik Dalam Praktik Keperawatan. Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Keperawatan Indonesia, 8(04), 497–507. https://doi.org/10.33221/jiiki.v8i04.154
  26. Wikipedia.org Retrieved from https://id.wikipedia.org/wiki/Daftar_rumah_sakit_di_Indonesia
  27. William, J. R. (2006) Panduan Etika Manual. Penerbit Pusat Studi Kedokteran Islam Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas Muhammadiyah, Yogyakarta.
  28. Zulhasmar, E. (2008). Implikasi Hukum Penolakan Tindakan Medik. Lex Jurnalica, 5(2), 83–111.