Article Sidebar

Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 21 Download : 9

Main Article Content

Abstract

Researchers at state institutions were forced to leave their positions, including those at the Constitutional Court. Researchers then lose the opportunity to hold the title of research professor. These researchers were also given a new duty, which was to help courts and give Constitutional Justices substantial support. The predicate “assistance" in this rule, which receives no detailed explanation, leads to multiple interpretations and affects the productivity of assistants to expert constitutional judges. Based on this, it is interesting to discuss how the status quo regulates career paths and academic freedom of Constitutional Court researchers in personnel law and how the ideal concept of setting career paths and academic freedom for researchers at the Constitutional Court. This study uses a normative research method, in which its results implicitly suggest a return to the previous rules. The researcher also suggests that the positions of assistant judge and researcher be strictly separated and that opportunities be provided for researchers to hold the title of academic professor. Researchers think BRIN should merge research institutions with the same form and function.

Keywords

Civil Apparatus Judges Assistant Constitutional Court

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Barus, S. I., Saifulloh, P. P. A., Amancik, & Nikenuna, S. (2026). RECONSTRUCTING THE STATUS OF CONSTITUTIONAL COURT RESEARCHERS: MEREKONSTRUKSI STATUS PENELITI MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSIONAL. Constitutional Law Society, 5(1), 80–103. https://doi.org/10.36448/jcls.v5i1.143
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Academic Is Related to Schools, Colleges, and Universities, or Connected with Studying and Thinking Rather than Practical Skills or a Person Who Teaches at a College, or Who Studies as Part of Their Job, Https://Dictionary.Cambridge.Org/Dictionary/English/Academic.
  2. Article 6 Permen-Pan RB Number 41 Year 2023 Regarding Functional Positions, It States That the Level of Functional Expertise Positions Consists of Prominent, Middle, Junior, and First Experts.
  3. Asian Development Bank. Education in Indonesia: Rising to The Challenge. Paris: OCED Publishing, 2015.
  4. Atmosudirjo, S Prajudi. Hukum Administrasi Negara. Jakarta: Ghalia Indonesia, 1994.
  5. Azra, Azyumardi. Paradigma Baru Pendidikan Nasional Rekonstruksi Dan Demokratisasi. Jakarta: Kompas, 2002.
  6. Bakator, Mihalj. “Impact of Human Resource Management on Business Performance: A Review of Literature.” Journal of Engineering Management and Competitiveness 9, no. 1 (2019).
  7. Beitter, Kalus D. “Yearning to Belong: Finding A Home For the Right to Academic Freedom in The U.N. Human Rights Covenants.” Intercultural Human Rights Law Review 11 (2016).
  8. Bernardin, H John, and Joyce E A Russell. Human Resource Management. Singapore: McGraw Hill Inc., 1993.
  9. BRIN. “BRIN Kukuhkan 4 Penelitinya Sebagai Profesor Riset.” Https://Brin.Go.Id/News/110452/Brin-Kukuhkan-4-Penelitinya-Sebagai-Profesor-Riset, 2023.
  10. Chairah, Anggita. “Implementasi Sistem Merit Pada Aparatur Sipil Negara Di Indonesia.” Jurnal Borneo Administrator 16, no. 3 (2020).
  11. Constitutional Court of the Slovak Republic, Https://Www.Ustavnysud.Sk/En/Kancelaria-Ussr/Organizacna-Schema, Accessed on July 7, 2023.
  12. Constitutional Court of Turkey, Https://Anayasa.Gov.Tr/Media/7365/Introductory-Booklet.Pdf, Hlm. 16.
  13. Creswell, John W. Penelitian Kualitatif Dan Desain Riset: Memilih Diantara Lima Pendekatan. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar, 2015.
  14. Djaali. Hak Asasi Manusia (Suatu Tinjauan Teoretis Dan Aplikasi). Jakarta: Restu Agung, 2003.
  15. Holish, Amarru Muftie. “Keberpihakan Sistem Peradilan Dalam Upaya Perlindungan Kebebasan Akademis Kampus Dalam Berkumpul Dan Berserikat (Studi Analisis Putusan Nomor 23 /Pid.Sus/2015/Pn Kln).” The Digest: Journal of Jurisprudence and Legisprudence 1, no. 1 (2020).
  16. Https://www.Wusgermany.de/Sites/Wusgermany.de/Files/Userfiles/WUS-Internationales/Wus-Lima-Englisch.Pdf. “The Lima Declaration on Academic Freedom and Autonomy of Institutions of Higher Education of The Sixty-Eighth General Assembly of World University Service.”
  17. Hukum Online. “Menelusuri Asal Muasal Asisten Hakim Di Indonesia.” Https://Www.Hukumonline.Com/Berita/a/Menelusuri-Asal-Muasal-Asisten-Hakim-Di-Indonesia-Lt60cb23844b52e/?Page=1.
  18. Huo, Meng-Long. “Career Growth Opportunities, Thriving at Work and Career Outcomes: Can COVID-19 Anxiety Make a Difference?” Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management 48 (2021).
  19. Katharina, Riris. “Reformasi Manajemen Aparatur Sipil Negara.” Jurnal Sprit Publik 13, no. 2 (2018).
  20. Lampiran II, Peraturan Menteri Pendayagunaan Aparatur Negara Dan Reformasi Birokrasi Republik Indonesia Nomor 40 Tahun 2022.
  21. Mahfud MD, Moh. “Perspektif Politik Dan Hukum Tentang Kebebasan Akademik Dan Kritik Sosial.” UNISIA 17, no. 32 (1997).
  22. Mayangdarastri, Sista, and Khanifatul Khusna. “Retaining Millennials Engagement and Wellbeing Through Career Path and Development.” Journal of Leadership in Organizations 2, no. 1 (2020).
  23. Melsen, A G M van. Ilmu Pengetahuan Dan Tanggung Jawab Kita. Jakarta: Gramedia, 1992.
  24. Moonti, Roy Marteen. “Pelaksanaan Pengukuran Prestasi Kerja Terhadap Aparatur Sipil Negara (ASN) Di Dinas Pertanian Provinsi Gorontalo.” Jurnal Ilmiah Kebijakan Hukum 12, no. 2 (2018).
  25. Muladi. Demokratisasi, Hak Asasi Manusia, Dan Reformasi Hukum Di Indonesia. Jakarta: The Habibie Center, 2002.
  26. Nawawi, Hadari, and Mimi Martini. Penelitian Terpadu. Yogyakarta: Gajah Mada University Press, 1996.
  27. Nugroho, Riant D. Kebijakan Publik, Formulasi, Implementasi Dan Evaluasi. Jakarta: Elex Media Komputindo, 2003.
  28. Nursyamsi, Fajri. Hubungan Kelembagaan Pada Organisasi Pelaksana Penelitian, Pengembangan, Pengkajian, Dan Penerapan Dengan Kementerian Riset Dan Teknologi/BRIN. Jakarta: PSHK, 2021.
  29. Salatiga, Institut Agama Islam Negeri. Pedoman Kebebasan Akademik, Kebebasan Mimbar Akademik, Dan Otonomi Keilmuan. Salatiga: IAIN Salatiga, 2018.
  30. Simamora, Henry. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Yogyakarta: STIE YKPN, 1997.
  31. Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia, Decree of the Chairman of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia Number 62/KMA/SK/IV/2021 Previously Regulated in the Decree of the Chairman of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia Number 076/KMA/SK/VI/2009.
  32. Surbakti, Natangsa. “Kebebasan Akademik Dan Otonomi Keilmuan Hukum Di Indonesia.” Jurisprudence 1, no. 2 (2004).
  33. Teich, Albert H, and Mark S Frankel. Good Science and Responsible Scientists: Meeting the Challenge of Fraud and Misconduct in Science. Washington: American Association for the Advancement of Science, 1992.
  34. The Statement of the Right to Teaching Is Stated in Article 26 DUHAM, While the Right to Work and a Decent Income Is Stated in Article 23 of the UDHR, Meanwhile, the Right to Freedom of Holding and Expressing Opinions Is Stated in Article 19 of the UDHR. See: Peter Baehr Ed., Instrumen Internasional Pokok Hak-Hak Asasi Manusia, (Jakarta: Yayasan Obor Indonesia, 2001), Hlm. 285, 286, 287.
  35. Toader, Tudorel, and Marieta Safta. “Judges and Assistant-Magistrates Within Constitutional Courts.” Revista De Drept Constitutional, 2016.
  36. Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945 Pasal 31 Ayat (1) (2002).
  37. Woods, Tonja M. “Academic Freedom Should Be Redefined: Point and Counterpoint.” American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education 80, no. 9 (2016).