Main Article Content

Abstract

Data from the Ministry of Agrarian and Spatial Planning/National Land Agency in 2018 showed that the raw area of rice fields in Indonesia was only 7.1 million hectares (ha) or down compared to 2013 which was still 7.75 million hectares. This will of course have a negative impact onthe achievement of national food sovereignty vsi, coupled with the condition of regional agricultural regulations which are still sectoral and not comprehensive. By using a doctrinal approach, this paper aims todevelop a responsive legal model to create a food-sovereign district. The results of the study indicate that a responsive legal model to empower farmers and create food sovereignty districts is needed because so far regional regulations in the agricultural sector are still partial so that they have not fully supported the realization of the condition of food sovereignty. The targets to be realized, the scope of regulation, the scope, and direction of the regulation model of a responsive law-based food sovereignty district will contain three major parts, namely: the Agricultural Land Protection Division, the Farmer Protection and Empowerment Division, and the Irrigation Network Section, so that the realization of a sovereign district is realized. food can be achieved comprehensively.

Keywords

Food Sovereignty Model Responsive

Article Details

How to Cite
Firmansyah, A. A., Setyawan, Y. ., & Evendia, M. . (2022). RESPONSIVE LAW MODEL FOR REALIZING FOOD SOVEREIGNTY REGENCY. Constitutional Law Society, 1(1), 41–49. https://doi.org/10.36448/cls.v1i1.14

References

  1. Budiyono, Saleh, A., & Firmansyah, A. A. (2019). Design of Regional Regulations for the Protection of Sustainable Food Agricultural Lands to Support Food Sovereignty Policy. Research Report, LPPM Unila.
  2. Drafting Team. (2017). Academic Papers and Draft Law on Sustainable Agricultural Cultivation Systems, Commission IV DPRRI.
  3. Dwipradnyana, I. M.M. (2014). Factors Affecting Agricultural Land Conversion and Impact on Farmers' Welfare (case study in Subak Jadi, Kediri sub-district, Tabanan).
  4. Hansen, V.E, et al. (1992) Fundamentals and Practice of Irrigation. Erlangga: Jakarta.
  5. Hidayat, A. I. (2008). Analysis of Rice Field Conversion in East Java Province. journal: Faculty of Agriculture UPN.
  6. https://finance.detik.com/berita-ekonomi-bisnis/d-4270821/gunakan-method-baru-bps-catat-wide-baku-sawah-turun-jadi-71-juta-ha, accessed January 31, 2020.
  7. Kartsapoetra, A. G., & Sutedjo, M. (1994). Water Technology. Bumi Aksara: Jakarta.
  8. Khaeron, E.H. (2016). Food Diversification Development Model in Supporting National Food Security (A Case in West Java Province). Dissertation, Faculty of Agriculture. Padjadjaran University. Bandung.
  9. Mahmud, P. (2005). Legal Research. Kencana Prenada: Jakarta.
  10. Mamam, U. (2013). Agricultural Land Conversion and Food Sovereignty Issues. Journal of Agribusiness 7(1).
  11. Nonet, P., & Selznick, P. (2008). Responsive Law, translation from: Law and Society in Transition: Toward Responsive Law, Harper & Row, 1978. Translated by Raisul Muttaqien. Nusamedia. Bandung.
  12. Pasandaran, E. (1991). Irrigation in Indonesia: Strategy and Development, Jakarta: Institute for Research, Education and Information, Economics and Social Affairs.
  13. Samekto, F. X. A. (2013). Relation of Law with Power: Seeing Law in Reality Perspective. Journal of Legal Dynamics, 13(1).
  14. Siskel, S.E., Hutape, S. R. (1995). Irrigation in Indonesia The Role of Society and Research. LP3ES: Jakarta.
  15. Suradisastra, K., & Pasandaran, E. Highlighting the Dynamics of Agricultural Development in Eastern Indonesia: Workshop Proceedings, Jakarta: Ministry of Agriculture, Agency for Agricultural Research and Development.