Main Article Content

Abstract

Criminal liability regarding the Crime of Motor Vehicle Theft that this crime was committed by 2 people in which the defendant's actions were regulated and also threatened in Article 365 paragraph (2) of the 2nd Criminal Code. However, in this case there are still many people who commit the crime of motor vehicle theft in various ways even though the government has issued such regulations or legislation. As will be examined in this article, namely how is the criminal responsibility of the perpetrators against the perpetrators of the crime of motor vehicle theft in Decision No. 239/Pid.B/2021/PN.KBU? What is the basis for the judge's consideration in deciding the case against the perpetrators of the crime of motor vehicle theft in Decision No. 239/Pid.B/2021/PN.KBU?


The author in this study used empirical juridical research methods and normative juridical research. In empirical research, the author conducts interviews with related sources and in normative research, including literature, legislation, legal theory, and also judges' decisions. Also, empirical legal research includes legal identification, legal effectiveness, and law implementation.


From the results of the research, criminal liability against the perpetrator is a criminal act that is proven guilty and convinces the judge to convict the defendant with a criminal act of motor vehicle theft as regulated in Article 365 paragraph (2) of the 2nd Criminal Code, and the defendant fulfills the element of criminal responsibility. And the basis for the judge's consideration is to consider 2 (two) considerations, namely juridical considerations and non-juridical considerations. Based on this, the punishment should be adjusted to the threats that have been stipulated in the applicable legislation, and the judge should also pay attention to the impact of this crime even though in this case it did not take any lives but must be punished according to the regulations in order to provide a deterrent effect and reduce the level of crime. his crime.

Keywords

Liability Crime Theft

Article Details

Author Biographies

Arfinando Saputra, Universitas Muhammadiyah Kotabumi

Faculty of Law

M. Ruhly Kesuma Dinata, Universitas Muhammadiyah Kotabumi

Faculty of Law

Irhammudin, Universitas Muhammadiyah Kotabumi

Faculty of Law

How to Cite
Saputra, A. ., Dinata, M. R. K. ., & Irhammudin, I. (2024). CRIMINAL LIABILITY AGAINST THE CRIMINAL ACTION OF MOTOR VEHICLE THEft (STUDY OF DECISION NO. 239/PID.B/2021/PN.KBU). Constitutional Law Society, 3(1), 109–115. https://doi.org/10.36448/cls.v3i1.30

References

  1. Anwar, H.A.K Moch, Hukum Pidana Bagian Khusus, Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti, 2011.
  2. Chazawi, Adami, Pelajaran Hukum Pidana Bagian 1, Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2011.
  3. Efritadewi, Ayu, Modul Hukum Pidana, Tanjung pinang: Umrah Press,2020.
  4. Mahrus, Ali,Dasar-Dasar Hukum Pidana, Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2011.
  5. Nurahman Dwi, Hukum Pidana Dalam Prospeksi dan Teori, Bandar Lampung: Aura Publishing, 2017.
  6. P.A.F Lamintang, Delik-Delik Khusus, Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.2011.
  7. Prodjodikoro, Wirjono, Asas-Asas Hukum Pidana di Indonesia, Jakarta: Refika Aditama, 2010.
  8. Rusianto, Agus, TindakPidana dan Pertanggungjawaban Pidana, Jakarta: Prenamedia group, 2016.
  9. Saleh, Roselan, Perbuatan Pidana dan Pertanggungjawaban Pidana, Jakarta: Aksara Baru, 2017.
  10. Septa, KonsepPertanggungjawabanPidanaDalamHukumPidana Nasional Yang Akan Datang, JurnalCitaHukum, Vol.1 No.1, Jakarta :Universitas Muhammadiyah Jakarta, 2013.
  11. Sofyan, Andi, Azisa, Nur, Buku Ajar Pidana, Jakarta: Pustaka Pena Press, 2016.
  12. Surbakti, Sudaryono Natangsa, Hukum Pidana dan Dasar Hukum Pidana, Surakarta: Muhammadiyah University Press, 2011.
  13. Suyanto, Pengantar Hukum Pidana, Yogyakarta: Cv.Budi Utama,2018.
  14. Widnyana, I Made, Asas-Asas Hukum Pidana, Jakarta: PT. Fikahah Aneska,2010.
  15. Wirasila, Ngurah, A.A, Tindak Pidana Tertentu Dalam KUHP, Denpasar: Universitas Udayana, 2017.